To bring more value to pre-existing stakers and holders and the Wallet Connect ecosystem, I strongly encourage WC Leadership to do what Meteora on Solana did when they had their tokens drop. Gave the users the choice to have a liquidity base position, or token straight to the wallet, I chose the liquidity based position to save on Gas Fees plus my faith in the long term view, and I surely wasn’t the only one. I’ve been staking my WCT at max time length for a reason, I know WCT will be HIGHLY valuable soon enough, but to find ways to bring the value quicker doesn’t hurt either… and one way is to airdrop to those stakers who choose it, straight into either a liquidity based position on uniswap, etc. Or airdrop the tokens into investors wallets.
What do you think? I want to hear it. Would it be better to give holders the choice as to where and how they’d like to receive their tokens, like for example into a liquidity position to earn on trading fees or into a 30 day staking position? Or do you think it should just go straight to the wallet?
I completely agree! I really appreciate projects that offer the compound staking option. If you’re a long-term holder, it not only saves you on gas fees but also the time and hassle of remembering to claim and restake!
I generally agree. Some argue that relying too heavily on airdrops attracts only locust investors, which doesn’t contribute to the project’s long-term growth. I think a mechanism like “30% airdrop for immediate claims, 100% plus staking rewards for long-term staking” could also be effective.
Considero que esta bien la propuesta, incentiva a tu comunidad que tiene en stake sus tokens a seguir poniéndolos en ese sector de staking futuras recompensas.
Los stakers son la base del ecosistema debería igual wallet connect iniciar su propia web donde uno interactueven lending liquidez stake trading swap etc, ya es momento de avanzar wct ya verán como si el proyecto se expande en otras áreas wct se irá a la luna.
